Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessMCP serverCallable by AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsEntity graphSnapshotsPoint-in-time, bitemporal

By use case

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →

Platform

APIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots

Solutions

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →

Desk

Care quality

Provider performance, patient outcomes, and accreditation — how care is delivered and where it slips.

11 studies on this desk

  • Who runs the clinical trials: academia, not pharma, 2026

    Of the 589,453 studies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, 71.4% are run by academic and hospital sponsors and only 22.1% by industry — the registry of medical research is led by universities, not pharma. Yet industry runs 41.2% of phased drug-development trials, and 53.8% of all sponsors registered just one study.

    2026-06-17 · 9 min
  • The 1% penalty: which hospitals lose Medicare pay for hospital-acquired conditions, FY2026

    In CMS's FY2026 Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, 719 of 3,055 hospitals — the worst-performing quarter by total HAC score — lose 1% of every Medicare payment for the year. The cut is graded on a curve: most hospitals beat the national infection baseline, yet a fixed quartile is penalized regardless.

    2026-06-17 · 9 min
  • Where clinical trials stop: the Phase 2 valley, 2026

    Of the 373,998 clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov that have reached a final outcome, 51,959 — about 1 in 7 — ended in discontinuation rather than completion. Attrition is uneven: 23.0% of settled Phase 2 trials stop early, against 14.7% at Phase 1, the signature of the efficacy-stage valley where a candidate must first prove it works.

    2026-06-16 · 9 min
  • How serious is the average FDA recall? About one in eleven is the most serious tier

    Of 56,777 FDA drug and device recalls on file, 5,237 — 9.2%, about one in eleven — carry Class I, the agency's most serious tier, signaling a reasonable probability of serious injury or death. Devices drive 68.9% of recalls; 99.4% are voluntary, company-initiated withdrawals, not FDA-ordered.

    2026-06-14 · 11 min
  • GLP-1 drugs now cost Medicare Part D $24.57 billion a year

    GLP-1 drugs cost Medicare Part D $24.57 billion in 2024 — 10.8% of the entire program's drug spending on just 1.3% of its prescriptions. Ozempic alone, at $12.38 billion, is the second-costliest drug in Part D; Mounjaro and Trulicity push the class past $24 billion.

    2026-06-12 · 11 min
  • HAC Reduction Program: 719 Hospitals Penalized in FY2026

    719 hospitals — 23.9% of 3,012 eligible — were penalized under the CMS Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program in FY2026, losing 1% of every Medicare payment for a full fiscal year. Every penalized hospital is named from official CMS data with reproducible methodology and a state-by-state breakdown.

    2026-06-06 · 10 min
  • How fast do nursing homes fix what surveyors cite? 28.5 days for the harmful ones

    Across 415,849 corrected CMS nursing home health deficiencies, the mean time from survey to documented correction is 32 days — but the harm-level citations, Severity G and above, close faster, in 28.5 days. The more severe the finding, the quicker the fix. Texas and Illinois correct in about two weeks; Washington, D.C. takes nine.

    2026-06-04 · 14 min
  • DaVita and Fresenius Control 74% of U.S. Dialysis: A Facility-Level Comparison

    DaVita and Fresenius Medical Care together operate 73.7% of the 7,557 Medicare-certified dialysis facilities in the United States. Chain-owned centers average 2.92 CMS stars versus 2.27 for independents — independents are 3.7× more likely to receive a 1-star rating. State-level market concentration, chain rankings, and reproducible SQL from CMS Care Compare.

    2026-06-04 · 12 min
  • 1,753 Four- and Five-Star Nursing Homes Had Severity-G or Worse Deficiencies

    30% of four- and five-star CMS-rated nursing homes had at least one severity-G or worse deficiency in the three-year window: 668 five-star facilities and 1,085 four-star. Severity G means a CMS surveyor documented actual harm to a resident. Every facility named from federal data with reproducible SQL and sub-rating analysis.

    2026-06-04 · 14 min
  • Nursing Home Ownership Networks: Chain Operators, REITs, and the 82% Data Gap

    The 14,699 Medicare-certified nursing homes in the United States are nominally owned by thousands of entities, but effective control is concentrated in fewer than 50 documented chain operators and 4 healthcare REIT landlords. The CMS SNF All Owners dataset reveals the network — and the 82.40% top-10-chain data gap that makes full disclosure structurally impossible.

    2026-06-03 · 14 min
  • Why 14% of skilled nursing facilities had a quality drop in Q1

    Across 5,148 SNFs in Q1 2026, the composite quality score declined by an average of 0.06 points — but the decline was not evenly distributed. Facilities that changed ownership in the prior twelve months accounted for a disproportionate share of the slide.

    2026-05-12 · 8 min

Other desks

  • Financial distress
  • Access
  • Workforce
All research →

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily reconciliation

Published counts are reconciled against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareSanctionsOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research
Research hubGlossaryComparisonsCitationsWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Request access→

The substrate, by the numbers

44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
35dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
65reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures